First, rest assured that the decision to have a trial (or not) is yours. Second, Smith & White, PLLC are veteran criminal defense attorneys. Third, you will know what is involved, what pieces are key and what risks you are taking. That said, jury trials are the ultimate test of evidence–“the crucible of cross-examination”–and often a marathon of endurance and wits for the attorney, and stress for the client. The anxiety, uncertainty and public scrutiny causes most persons accused of crimes to avoid them. In fact, likely less than 1 in 10 of persons accused of a crime for the first time elect to have a trial.
A jury trial is to twelve jurors of “your peers” in a superior court matter and six jurors in a district or municipal court matter. For you, jail or prison time is always a potential consequence. That’s what gives you the right to a jury trial. You cannot have one for a ticket where only a monetary penalty is in question. Now, in Washington state, the government, a.k.a. the prosecution, has been ruled to be a “party” to the case and it also has a right to a jury trial. In the old days you could choose to have your trial to a judge instead of a jury. That is still possible but now the government must agree as well. Some issues are better for a judge and some for a jury. Smith & White, PLLC will advise you accordingly.
The “jury pool” is regular people — usually taken from the voters’ rolls and selected at random by the court, — who have taken the time to fulfill their civic duty. Many have jobs that will pay for their time away, i.e., Boeing employees. If the person does not vote and does not respond to court mailings then they have no chance of being on a jury. Jurors are not distinguished by race, creed, color, gender, sexual orientation, religion, etc. So, when they say “your peers” it is the old British meaning of people of the same class. Commoners judged by commoners and, since America does not have royalty, that’s everybody.
The “jury pool” is whittled down to an actual jury by a process called “Voir Dire,” or now more commonly called jury selection. The judge elects an appropriate amount of time for each side, prosecution and defense, depending on the complexity of the case. Each side is allowed to talk about issues related to the case, but not the case itself, to make sure that the potential jurors can be fair jurors. The fine line between the case and not the case itself is one of the many reasons you need a veteran criminal defense attorney like Smith & White, PLLC.
Both sides ask questions of the jury pool. Both sides can ask the judge to excuse jurors “for cause”–one of their answers demonstrated that they cannot be fair. Each side also gets “preemptory challenges.” Each side usually has three challenges for a six-panel jury and six for a twelve-panel jury but the judge has the discretion to change this number as long as it remains equal. This means you can get rid of that many potential jurors for no reason stated. However, if it looks like you are discriminating for one of the above stated reasons (race, etc.) that can lead to a Batson challenge. Basically, you and the prosecutor are not allowed to do that.
Once both sides have used their challenges the remaining front six or twelve is the jury. They are sworn in to follow the law. The judge instructs them not to discuss the case with anyone, including each other, until the presentation of all the evidence is concluded. The judge tells them not to do any of their own investigation, including not looking things up on their smartphones.
The jury decides the “ultimate question”: Whether you are guilty or not guilty of the crime/s. Note that they do not decide if you are guilty or innocent. There is no legal obligation for a defendant or the defense attorney to prove their innocence. The failure of the prosecution to convince a jury “beyond a reasonable doubt” means they should return a verdict of not guilty. Beyond a reasonable doubt will be discussed elsewhere.
What the jury is allowed to hear in making this decision is an interesting and complex intersection of facts and law. Some things, even though a fact, are not allowed to be put in front of the jury. Usually these facts are irrelevant (wasting everyone’s time), unreliable or unfairly prejudicial. There are entire courses taught about the rules of evidence. The rules themselves are a large volume. And there are many more volumes that discuss the rules. Also, there are cases where the courts interpret the rules. So, again, you’ll benefit from your veteran Smith & White criminal defense attorney.
The facts to a jury are usually proved through testimony. Testimony is someone, under oath, saying what they themselves heard, saw, etc. This is evidence. You’ve might’ve heard someone say that the prosecution has no evidence — just the word of a bunch of people. The word of one person, much less a bunch of them, is evidence. If the jury chooses to believe those words then that is sufficient evidence for a jury to find one guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
Likely what these people mean is that there is no “corroborating evidence”: physical evidence that supports what the witness says is true. In fact, one of the things Smith & White commonly analyzes is whether there should be other evidence if things happened as the witness says. The failure of the prosecution to present this other evidence that likely should have been gathered and presented is a common argument that proof beyond a reasonable doubt has not been offered.
Fortunately, you have a very powerful right to cross-examine the witnesses against you. Your criminal defense lawyer can question them about the lack of corroborating evidence. We can also question them about their own motives and biases. Maybe they get a benefit if you go to jail or get convicted. Maybe they already did not like you for some reason. Maybe they have a record that makes them less believable in general. Your criminal defense attorney gets to ask them about all these issues that show they may not be truthful or may not be right about what they have to say.
After the prosecution has presented all their witnesses and evidence, all of which is subject to cross-examination by your attorney, you then have the right to present your own case. You have the legal right to subpoena and present witnesses. You could potentially get a material witness warrant if you can prove proof of service of the subpoena to the witness. Of course, it’s best if your witnesses come to testify by their own choice. All of your witnesses, including yourself should you chose to testify, will be subject to cross-examination by the prosecution. So, it is important to be prepared for that cross-examination. Your Smith & White criminal defense attorney can help greatly with that preparation.
After hearing testimony through direct- and cross-examination and seeing what evidence has been admitted, the judge reads the jury instructions to the jury. Jury instructions are summaries of the law, drafted by both sides and argued to the judge as to which should be presented, that the judge has selected. They always explain to the jury the elements of the offense. For example, in a theft charge the elements are: 1) taking of property, 2) belonging to another, 3) without their consent, 4) of a certain value, etc. In all criminal cases the jury is instructed that each element must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
After the instructions come closing arguments. Both sides are given a set amount of time, again set by the judge depending on the complexity of the case, to argue. Argument is not really an argument since each side takes a turn. They take turns arguing that the facts do or do not fulfill the instructions so the jury should return a verdict of guilty or not guilty. The prosecutor, for no real good reason, is allowed to go first and last. This is completely unfair in my opinion but it is a well established precedent.
After argument, the jury is sequestered. They are put in a room where they may now discuss the case with each other. They are kept in the room (during business hours) until they have reached a decision of guilty or not guilty or decided that they will never reach such a decision. All of the jurors must agree with the decision and sometimes they cannot. If they cannot agree on a result then a mistrial is declared. This allows the prosecutor to re-file the case starting things all over from the beginning if they so choose. The prosecution usually only does so in the most serious of cases.
If the decision is guilty then the Judge will impose a sentence. Sometimes this is done right away. Sometimes a later sentencing date is selected. If the decision is not guilty then the case is over and the defendant (a.k.a. client) is allowed to leave without any conditions. You will be free to never to have this charge raised again (in a criminal court by the same “Sovereign”). If the jury cannot decide it is called a “hung jury” or mistrial. The prosecution has the option of starting the case all over again.
Call Smith & White today to start to prepare you for this ordeal or to start the work of avoiding it if that is your preference.
Legal Guides Published on Avvo.com by Derek
Firearms Law In Washington for Pre-1996 felony convictions – Read Guide
Three things not to do at your arraignment to ensure that you go home afterwards – Read Guide
4 Reasons to get an attorney to help you with Protection Orders – Read Guide
Top three reasons to get an attorney to represent you in a Domestic Violence case – Read Guide
Tips for dealing with suspended licenses – Read Guide
Some Practical Do’s and Don’ts Involving Use of Deadly Force in Washington State – Read Guide
Why you want an attorney to handle your drug asset forfeiture – Read Guide
Does a victim need to “press charges” in Washington for a person to be charged with a crime? – Read Guide
Legal Guides Published on Avvo.com by James
Getting that Pesky Dismissed or Vacated Charge off Your Record – Read Guide
Constructive Possession and Unwitting Possession – Read Guide
Were You Read Your Rights? – Read Guide
So You Admitted You were Driving – Read Guide
Do You Need to Intend a DUI? – Read Guide
Stopped for Lane Travel – Read Guide
Field Sobriety Tests for DUIs – Read Guide
How to Get the No Contact Order Dropped – Read Guide
Top Ten Responses to Being Interrogated by Law Enforcement – Read Guide
What to Bring to Your Arraignment – Read Guide